Headquarters of ride-sharing technology company Uber in the South of Market (SoMa) neighborhood of San Francisco on October 13, 2017.
Enlarge / Headquarters of ride-sharing know-how firm Uber within the South of Market (SoMa) neighborhood of San Francisco on October 13, 2017.

California voters decisively authorized a poll measure Tuesday permitting ride-hail providers like Uber and Lyft to deal with their drivers as impartial contractors, not staff. With 72 p.c of the vote counted, Proposition 22 is successful by a 58-percent to 42-percent margin. That is a sufficiently big lead for the Related Press to mission its passage.

Uber’s inventory rose 14 p.c in Wednesday buying and selling. Lyft is up 12 p.c.

The measure had heavy monetary backing from Uber, Lyft, and different “gig financial system” firms that make use of massive numbers of drivers. They funded each signature gathering and an costly advert blitz to persuade voters to assist it.

Prop. 22 rolls again AB 5—however just for drivers

That was a response to final 12 months’s passage of AB 5, a California legislation that codified a broad definition of employment below California legislation. The legislation made it rather more tough for firms to keep away from offering advantages like extra time pay and unemployment insurance coverage to their staff—not solely drivers however different professions throughout the California financial system. It additionally exempted a lot of white-collar professions from the brand new guidelines.

AB 5 was controversial as a result of it made it tough for freelance staff to take care of their independence. For instance, some freelance photographers and journalists lobbied California’s legislature to cross followup laws to permit them to keep impartial contractors.

Uber and Lyft argued that AB 5 would power them to completely rethink how they run their providers. Additionally they argued that the laws could be unhealthy for his or her drivers, most of whom worth the pliability of the present mannequin. If drivers turned staff, and subsequently eligible for a minimal wage, Uber and Lyft must extra intently supervise when and the place they drove. Drivers might lose the flexibility to activate the app every time and wherever they selected, the businesses mentioned.

Uber and Lyft warned that in the event that they have been pressured to adjust to the legislation earlier than November’s election they must shut down operations in California in an effort to reorganize the service. A final-minute ruling in August allowed the businesses to proceed with their present mannequin till the election.

This is how we described Proposition 22 again in August:

The November poll initiative would strip drivers of worker standing however supply them a number of the protections and advantages that include worker classification. Uber drivers could be assured to earn 120 p.c of California’s minimal wage whereas they’re finishing journeys. They might even be reimbursed for supply bills at a fee of 30 cents per mile, and staff that logged sufficient hours behind the wheel might get reimbursed for medical insurance premiums.

Nevertheless, below Uber’s proposal, drivers’ earnings wouldn’t be assured for time when they’re logged in to an app ready for an task. In consequence, drivers might nonetheless wind up making lower than minimal wage for the entire time they’re logged in to the app.

The proposition authorized by voters yesterday would not change AB 5 extra broadly. California legislation will proceed to make it tough for employers to categorise most kinds of lower-skilled staff as impartial contractors.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here