Grainy photograph of computer components.

Micro Magic’s new CPU prototype is seen right here operating on an Odroid board.

Micro Magic Inc.—a small digital design agency in Sunnyvale, California—has produced a prototype CPU that’s a number of instances extra environment friendly than world-leading opponents, whereas retaining affordable uncooked efficiency.

We first seen Micro Magic’s claims earlier this week, when EE Occasions reported on the corporate’s new prototype CPU, which seems to be the quickest RISC-V CPU on the earth. Micro Magic advisor Andy Huang claimed the CPU might produce 13,000 CoreMarks (extra on that later) at 5GHz and 1.1V whereas additionally placing out 11,000 CoreMarks at 4.25GHz—the latter, all whereas consuming solely 200mW. Huang demonstrated the CPU—operating on an Odroid board—to EE Occasions at 4.327GHz/0.8V, and 5.19GHz/1.1V.

Later the identical week, Micro Magic introduced the identical CPU might produce over 8,000 CoreMarks at 3GHz whereas consuming solely 69mW of energy.

OK, however what’s a CoreMark?

A part of the problem in evaluating Micro Magic’s declare for its new CPU lies in determining simply what a CoreMark is and what number of of them are wanted to make a quick CPU. It is a intentionally simplified CPU benchmarking device launched by the Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium, supposed to be as platform-neutral and easy to construct and use as potential. CoreMark focuses solely on the core pipeline capabilities of a CPU, together with fundamental learn/write, integer, and management operations. This particularly avoids most results of system variations in reminiscence, I/O, and so forth.

The Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium (EMBC) is a bunch with huge trade illustration: Intel, Texas Devices, ARM, Realtek, and Nokia are just a few of its extra notable and simply recognizable members.

Now that we understood all that, the subsequent step in an effort to higher consider Micro Magic’s claims was to run just a few CoreMark benchmarks of our personal. All we would have liked to do right here was clone its GitHub repository, then challenge a make command—optionally, with arguments XCFLAGS="-DMULTITHREAD=8 -DUSE_FORK=1" if we need to check on a number of threads/cores directly.

I nonetheless have an Apple M1 Mac Mini readily available, in addition to a Ryzen 7 4700U-powered Acer Swift 3, so these had been my check techniques for comparability. Getting the uncooked efficiency scores was significantly simpler than getting really comparable energy readings. On the Ryzen powered Linux system, I used the utility turbostat to get each Core and Bundle energy readings whereas the checks had been operating.

I haven’t got entry to something almost as fine-grained as turbostat for the Apple M1, so for that platform I took whole-system energy draw on the wall and simply plain subtracted the studying at desktop idle from the sustained studying whereas underneath check. That is extraordinarily crude, and I warning readers to not rely an excessive amount of on evaluating the M1’s effectivity to the Swift 3’s on these numbers alone—nevertheless it’s adequate to get some perspective on Micro Magic’s declare for its new RISC-V (pronounced “threat 5”) CPU.

On to the checks!

The Micro Magic CPU is, for the second, single-core and single-threaded—though Huang says it might “simply” be constructed as a 25-core half. Micro Magic has supplied figures—and in a single case, a screenshot—for efficiency at 3GHz, 4.25GHz, and 5GHz. On the maximally power-efficient 3GHz clockrate, the Micro Magic CPU scores about 1/4 the CoreMarks of both the Ryzen 4700u or Apple M1. On the maximally performant 5GHz clock, it manages simply over a 3rd of their efficiency.

This is sufficient to tell us that the Micro Magic chip in its present type is not a world-class competitor for conventional ARM and x86 CPUs in cellphone or laptop computer functions—nevertheless it’s a lot nearer to them than earlier RISC-V implementations have been. On the power-efficient 3GHz clockrate, the Micro Magic CPU is almost thrice sooner than, for instance, SiFive’s Freedom U540 CPU operating single-threaded. At 5GHz, it outruns all 4 of the SiFive’s cores.

We can see the Micro Magic CPU on Odroid board here, scoring 8,200 iterations/sec over 10 seconds. The multimeter attached to the board is reading 69mW—according to Micro Magic, that's a measurement taken during the run, not at idle afterward.
Enlarge / We are able to see the Micro Magic CPU on Odroid board right here, scoring 8,200 iterations/sec over 10 seconds. The multimeter connected to the board is studying 69mW—in line with Micro Magic, that is a measurement taken in the course of the run, not at idle afterward.

At roughly 1 / 4 the efficiency of world-leading x86 and ARM cell processors, the Micro Magic CPU does not sound like a lot but. However once we think about energy effectivity, issues get loopy. I gave my Ryzen and Apple processors the advantage of each potential doubt when producing the above charts—I used core energy (not whole package deal energy) on the Ryzen 4700U and ran checks with the Gnome3 desktop shut down. For the Apple, I solely had entry to whole-system energy draw, so I subtracted the “desktop idle” energy draw from the “underneath check” energy draw.

I examined the Apple and AMD CPUs each single-threaded and multithreaded when checking energy effectivity. Unsurprisingly, each elements produced extra efficiency per watt when exercised with one work thread for every accessible CPU thread. None of this made a lot of a dent within the Micro Magic’s commanding lead in energy effectivity.

At 4.25GHz, the Micro Magic can accomplish the identical workload because the Ryzen 4700U with lower than one-third the ability required. At 3GHz, that determine plummets to lower than one-eighth the ability required.

What’s it good for?

The Linux working system already helps RISC-V structure—so for headless or near-headless controllers that merely must ship respectable efficiency paired with excessive energy effectivity, Micro Magic’s new CPU is probably going many of the approach there. Issues get significantly extra sophisticated when you begin speaking about complete, consumer-friendly techniques, in fact. Even other than {hardware} issues like GPU and LTE modem, creating a whole Android cellphone based mostly on a non-ARM structure is more likely to be a a lot greater endeavor.

With that mentioned, it is value mentioning that—if we take Micro Magic’s numbers as a right—they’re already beating the efficiency of some strong cell phone CPUs. Even at its efficiency-first 3GHz clockrate, the Micro Magic CPU outperformed a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820. The Snapdragon 820 is not world-class anymore, nevertheless it’s no slouch, both—it was the processor within the US model of Samsung’s Galaxy S7.

If we use the EMBC’s printed single-core rating for the Snapdragon 820 together with Anandtech’s single-core CPU energy check outcome, we get about 16,000 CoreMarks per watt. That is triple the effectivity of the Ryzen 4700u operating single-threaded, and a bit higher than par with it when the Ryzen’s operating an optimally multithreaded workload.

In different phrases, Micro Magic’s prototype CPU is each considerably sooner and tremendously extra power-efficient than a fairly trendy and nonetheless very succesful smartphone CPU.


All of this sounds very thrilling—Micro Magic’s new prototype is delivering strong smartphone-grade efficiency at a fraction of the ability price range, utilizing an instruction set that Linux already runs natively on. Higher but, the corporate itself is not an unknown.

Micro Magic was initially based in 1995 and was bought by Juniper Networks in $260 million. In 2004, it was reborn underneath its authentic identify by the unique founders—Mark Santoro and Lee Tavrow, who initially labored at Solar and led the group which developed the 300MHz SPARC microprocessor.

Micro Magic intends to supply its new RISC-V design to prospects utilizing an IP licensing mannequin. The simplicity of the design—RISC-V requires roughly one-tenth the opcodes that trendy ARM structure does—additional simplifies manufacturing issues, since RISC-V CPU designs could be in-built shuttle runs, sharing house on a wafer with different designs.

With that mentioned, it might be an unlimited endeavor to port—for instance—a whole smartphone ecosystem, resembling business Android, to a brand new structure. Along with constructing the working system itself—not simply the kernel, however drivers for all {hardware} from GPU to Wi-Fi to LTE modem, and extra—third-party app builders would wish to recompile their very own functions for the brand new structure as nicely.

We’re additionally nonetheless taking a reasonably honest quantity of Micro Magic’s claims at face worth. Whereas we have seen a screenshot of an 8,200 CoreMark rating, and we have seen a 69mW energy studying, it isn’t totally clear that the ability studying was consultant of your complete benchmark run.

Nonetheless, that is an thrilling improvement. Not solely does the brand new design seem to carry out nicely whereas massively breaking effectivity data, it is doing so with a much more ideologically open design than its opponents. The RISC-V ISA—not like x86, ARM, and even MIPS—is open and supplied underneath royalty-free licenses.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here